My curiosity is fueled by the notion something to the effect that "rules are rules and you know what they are going in."
If your star player violates those rules, why should he be exempt? I don't really know how strict the Yankees are about their no-facial hair rule, but let's say they are procrustean, and Robinson Cano grows a beard, the reasons for which are nobody's business but his own. Shouldn't "rules are rules" be applied in this situation?
No big deal. I just wonder if we sometimes speak with forked tongues.
As for uniforms, what if the brass says you've got to wear your pants/socks/stirrups the old-fashioned way, and you choose not to. Suspension?




Reply With Quote


